Apple has been pushing the boundaries of what’s possible within the sphere of computing, releasing small device after small device that’s capable of ever more functionality. With all the impressive engineering that this has required, it’s safe to wonder why these same engineers seem to have regressed in certain areas. Specifically, their move towards laptops with non-user replaceable batteries has been pretty baffling. In the past, a laptop battery lasted for several years, then refused to hold a charge any longer. The user simply replaced it, which kept them on their familiar machine for about 100 dollars.
Then came the new version of the Macbook Pro. This version offered 40% greater battery longevity per charge, a real bonus for power strapped travellers moving between flights or otherwise finding it difficult to power up. According to the company however, as part of the engineering required to add such longevity, the battery would no longer be held in place with a simple twist-lock device as in the past.
This resulted in public outcry and confusion. Apple touts itself as a green company, but users suddenly need to pitch their laptops after the promised 1,000 charge lifespan of the battery? The outcry was loud, and the company backtracked on their seeming engineering backtrack, and admitted that the battery could be replaced by qualified technicians. Apple technicians, no doubt, which keeps the replacement costs going to this crafty company. Still, their shortsightedness on this issue has caused some to view the company in a far less favorable light.